Soo let's go!
Ohh and I'm sorry if this might be very boring, I'm not sure yet.. But I wanted to do this review so badly, but I wasn't really sure if I was to remember everything. So I thought, maybe these questions would help meeeee :)
Have fun!
PS: I left some questions out, because .. they were just weird and I didn't feel like answering them. Or they just weren't very helpfull.
c. Was the author trying to give information, to
explain something technical, to convince the reader of a belief’s validity by
dramatizing it in action?
e. Who is the intended audience?
Youth I guess..
f. What is the author's style? Is it formal or informal? Evaluate the
quality of the writing style by using some of the following standards:
coherence, clarity, originality, forcefulness, correct use of technical words,
conciseness, fullness of development, fluidity. Does it suit the intended
audience?
The style is very informal. Eeehhm.. it's very original. And I can assure you this book as a correct use of technical words. And it kind of does suit the intended audience. But some times it can be a little messy with people dying and blood and such things.
g. How did the
book affect you? Were any previous ideas you had on the subject changed,
abandoned, or reinforced due to this book? How is the book related to your own
course or personal agenda? What personal experiences you've had relate to the
subject?
h. How well has
the book achieved its goal?
I guess it did not totally achieved its goal, because there's a third book.. and the ending of this book was.. dreadful..
i. Would you
recommend this book or article to others? Why?
I don't feel like doing a REAL review..
GOODBYE
Keep on reading!
Hannah
No comments:
Post a Comment